Pages

Saturday, August 27, 2016

Inside Alex Garland's Halo (A Video Game Adaptation)

Image Source, Source 1, Source 2, "Die? Didn't You Know? Spartans Never Die!"
Halo, a video game series that revolves around an intergalactic war between human beings and an extremist alien race known as the Covenant, is noted for being one of the most influential first-person shooters of all time. Its in-depth and compelling stories, interesting characters, and its vast universe are known as some of the series' highlights. While I did not fully play any of the games, the free demo for Halo: Combat Evolved was loads of fun, and it did show me a glimpse of what the games have in store. Some might say that this game had enough ideas for a live-action adaptation in the style of The Lord of The Rings trilogy, and a full-length feature there could have been, and could have featured Peter Jackson as producer. On our latest cancelled movie spotlight, Dateline Movies heads straight into the far reaches of space, and again Hollywood's big trash bin, to discuss the now cancelled Halo adaptation!


Source, The Covenant Marches On!
How did it almost happen?

Alex Garland, one of the most amazing screenwriters in the modern cinematic industry, and also a personal favorite of mine, who is known for his works on 28 Days Later and Ex Machina, was originally the one who started the project. How he pitched the entire movie is pretty interesting and almost unbelievable, as Garland was accompanied by people dressed as various Master Chiefs, with two of them holding the screenplay and some terms and conditions.

With proper blessing courtesy of Microsoft, the game series' publisher, as well as a deal that involves the said studio earning about 10-million dollars and about 15% of the film's future revenue. Interested with the deal, 20th Century Fox and Universal Studios decided to join forces, and instead settle to offer 5-million dollars to Microsoft, with an added 10% from the total revenue of the film. Peter Jackson, noted for his success with The Lord of The Rings Trilogy and the King Kong remake, is set to produce the movie, with his protegee Neill Blomkamp acting as director, with this canned project supposed to be his directorial debut. Hellboy and Blade II director Guillermo Del Toro was also in talks to helm the project forward. There have been no cast members confirmed for the project. Below are the only people with confirmed involvement.

Original Writer: Alex Garland

Additional Rewrites: Josh Olson and D.B. Weiss

Executive Producer: Peter Jackson

Director: Neill Blomkamp


Source, As Some Fans Would Say, "10/10 Would Definitely Date Her"
What was suppose to happen?

The following story outline will be a simplified and shortened version of the leaked script. For various reasons, we could not seem to give away the entire script. We apologize for the inconvenience. Hopefully in good time, we might be able to share the complete script, so for now, do settle for this story outline.

Somewhere in space, a man-made ship known as the Pillar of Autumn, lead by Captain Keyes, is under attack from Covenant forces. To defend themselves, Keyes asks Cortana, the ship's artificial intelligence to awaken their "war dog" known only as Master Chief, a towering force to reckon with, from cryogenic slumber. With Master Chief awoken, the armored supersoldier assists his comrades in preventing unauthorized entries, but they are no match as more enemy reinforcements make their way through the ship. Ordering Master Chief to escort Cortana off the ship to prevent The Covenant from learning their secret files, Captain Keyes commands everyone else, including Major Silva and his elite Helljumpers, to evacuate to a Halo-shaped structure orbiting a nearby planet. This option is made possible because of the structure containing an atmosphere that is compatible with human body.


Source, Is It Me Or Did Interstellar Used The Same Structure?
As Master Chief, Cortana, and a band of other marines make their way to an intergalactic ring-shaped structure, followed by the rest of the marines in separate escape pods, Master Chief's lifeboat crashes violently, and the rest of his comrades are killed. As Master Chief and Cortana watch as the Pillar of Autumn crash, the two evade capture from pursuing Covenant troops and are able to lend a hand with the other marines.

Master Chief and Cortana hitch a ride with one of Chief's former colleagues, Carol Rawley, also known as Foehammer, en route to Major Silva's makeshift base. There, Silva orders Chief to stay away from combat as much as possible due to the lack of systems to upload Cortana.

After Master Chief tends to his wounds, both he and Cortana enter a shared dream, but his slumber is interrupted by the sound of an Elite Covenant alien's scream. Once there, Master Chief and Cortana discover that Major Silva and his Helljumpers are interrogating an alien. Angry, Cortana, who is originally unseen due to being a program in Master Chief's armor, appears in a bright light and clearly broken form to ask Silva about what he intends to do. Silva reveals that The Covenant is holding Captain Keyes, who survived the crash, captive, and they are planning a rescue mission, to which Cortana and Master Chief offer their services.


Source, All Of Hell(Jumper) Is Breaking Loose!
Cortana, Silva, Master Chief and about twenty Helljumpers are able to intercept The Covenant's battle cruiser, Truth and Reconciliation, but they are in for a surprise when they learn that The Covenant has anti-gravity on their side, and once on board, they are ambushed by, not one, but two hulking Covenant monsters. Fortunately, there are some handy-dandy adhesive plasma grenades around the corner of the ship, and Master Chief dispatches one of the creatures by blowing-up its back, its helmet and finally its arm cannon, killing it in the process. The other "Hunter" is eventually killed by an overloaded fuel rod cannon in the ship.

As the half of the still alive unit cause a distraction, Master Chief, Cortana, Major Silva and the rest of the remaining Helljumpers leap to the rescue. Eventually, they are able to locate Keyes through one of The Covenant's ship computers, just in a nick of time for the team to save Keyes from further torture. Afterwards, the ragtag rescue team make their escape through the use of a stolen Covenant escape ship, although slightly damaged, which they then use to reach their base.


Source, The Reign of The Forerunners is Upon Us!
Startled at her discovery from the Truth and Reconciliation vessel, Cortana reveals to the rest of the forces that the orbital construct that they are in, identified as "Halo", is a weapon of unknown power that is once built by an ancient, deadly civilization of aliens known as "The Forerunners", the Covenant's very own pantheon. In addition, The Forerunners are the source of several of The Covenant's weaponry. They then update their objectives from search-and-rescue to shutting down Halo, and they start with a location Cortana says is named "The Silent Cartographer".

Master Chief, Cortana, Major Silva, Captain Keyes and a lot of their forces make their move towards The Silent Cartogtapher. After a lengthy battle outside their target, they enter a massive temple-like entrance and structure. They are ambushed by a handful of stealth-based Covenant units, suffering from a brutal blow to their ranks. Chief and Cortana go deeper without the aid of their allies most of whom have been wounded in the ambush. Meanwhile, back in the Pillar of Autumn crash site, wherein the Helljumpers are assigned to investigate what The Covenant is afraid of, something big has escaped, and has slaughtered Captain Keyes, Major Silva and all of the Helljumpers.


Source, "Open The Flood Gates!"
Cortana and Chief finally reach The Silent Cartographer, which is a large X-Men's Cerebro-like holographic projection room. Cortana suddenly acts erratically upon hacking into the single console in the chamber, and Chief is knocked unconscious after an explosion of light. Chief, after waking-up, searches desperately for both Cortana and the rest of his allies, but to no avail. He stumbles upon Corporal Jenkins, the soldier he saved earlier. Paranoid at the unknown, Jenkins got the gun he gave to Chief and killed himself in front of Chief. Chief then hears a terrifying sound and quickly retreats to a dead end, only to beheld the horrific sight of his swayed comrades. All of his colleagues are infected with mysterious organisms attached to their faces.

After fending-off a horde of enemies, Chief makes his way into a possible exit, where an enigmatic robotic spheroid named 343 Guilty Spark, programmed to contain the mind-controlling "Flood", alongside an army of Sentinels rescue Chief from the Flood-infested soldiers. Through 343 Guilty Spark, Chief learns, as he is accompanied by Guilty Gear to Halo's control room, that Halo is a holding installation for the study of the Flood. As Guilty Spark asks Chief to activate the "sterilization" protocol, Cortana manifests and blasts Guilty Spark, who is actually trying to kill an entire galaxy with Halo's defense mechanisms instead of the Flood. His motivation for this was that the moment Halo was activated, everything became "pointless". Angry, Chief shoots Guilty Spark.


Source, 343 Guilty Gear Looks Strikingly Similar To Portal 2's Wheatley
As the weather control system of Halo malfunctions, blizzards form, and more of the Flood spawn, destroying the encampment. Chief and Cortana are rescued by Foehammer, who became the sole survivor of the destruction of their base. In Foehammer's airship, the three hatch a plan to destroy Halo without sacrificing the universe, and that is by using the Pillar of Autumn's fusion reactors to cause a devastating explosion.

They then encounter an infested Captain Keyes, with the Flood parasite that is controlling its host plunging Cortana and Chief into Chief's flashback, the time when he failed to save lives on a planet known as Reach. As Keyes continues to mutate, Chief battles the being's telepathic power, and after shooting the turned Keyes, 343 Guilty Spark enters, alive, as Cortana activates a self-destruct sequence. Chief and Cortana rides a Warthog, a military vehicle, as they maneuver their way to the crash site, and finally to Foehammer's rendezvous point, seeing the now turned Silva to brutally murder Foehammer in front of Chief and Cortana. Finally, the anger was just too much for Chief to overcome, and so he shoved a grenade into Silva's chest. In the end, we see Chief and Cortana, the only survivors after Halo explodes, make their way back to Earth by trying to steal a covenant ship as the screen fades to black.

In the post-credits scene, 343 Guilty Gear apparently survived his ordeal with Chief and Cortana as he hums whimsically, and breaks the fourth wall by greeting the audience directly, in the vast void of space.


Source, Writer Alex Garland
What happened instead?

The project was officially given the greenlight to continue production after several studios bid for the script. Given that the video game series has a large fanbase that supports each installment wholeheartedly, and a treasure trove of interesting source material, as a paraphrase to one of our sources, the reason behind the script bidding war is clear as day. Unfortunately, the production would be delayed over and over and over again due to studio conflicts with regards to the rights made by the ever growing bidding clash, mixed with Microsoft Studios' demands.

Another concern that was raised was the film's potential predictability, especially when it comes to those who are all too familiar with the source material, simply because the entire movie, as I have compared between the script and the synopsis for Halo: Combat Evolved, bears unbelievable amounts of adaptation accuracy. It is because of this that studios feared that the movie would become unsurprising enough for audiences to call it lackluster.


Source, Director Neill Blomkamp
Microsoft continued their seemingly endless pursuit for a decent adaptation, even in the midst of the complete kind of pressure that one can only experience here in Hollywood. Josh Olson, writer of the Tom Cruise starred mystery film Jack Reacher, and D.B. Weiss, a scribe for the television adaptation of Game of Thrones, were tasked to accomplish rewrites on the script. After facing further pressure from both 20th Century Fox and Universal Studios, which goes the same for Neill Blomkamp, the film is inevitably scrapped, with the film rights eventually returning to Microsoft.

Neill Blomkamp, whose initial directorial debut was suppose to be this particular film, eventually collaborated once more with his legendary mentor Peter Jackson in the acclaimed award-winning District 9. Blomkamp, who was pressured due to his supposed lack of experience to helm a big-budget feature back then, stated in an interview that he is not interested in tagging along the project if ever it is given another chance.

However, Blomkamp may be lying as he is currently rumored to helm the pilot episode of an upcoming Halo television program, with Steven Spielberg slated as executive producer. If you are wondering, yes, it is still active. 

Alex Garland would continue achieving success in other influential projects such as Sunshine, and even crossing streams with video games by being the story consultant for DmC: Devil May Cry, and as a writer for Enslaved: Odyssey To The West. He will then complete his directorial debut in 2015's Ex Machina. He is slated to have his second directorial feature, Annihilation, and is set to be released some time next year.



A direct-to-video feature known as Halo 4: Forward Unto Dawn, which is made as a means of promotion for the then upcoming installment, Halo 4, was released on December 4, 2012. The movie, which is actually a compilation of all 15-minute episodes of a web-series of the game, focuses on the origins of another video game character, Thomas Lansky, and how he became a hero himself. The movie and the series received mixed reviews, with the story attracting criticism for its pace and lack of character development, but the special effects received praise.



Alien and Blade Runner director Ridley Scott served as executive producer, accompanied by his production company Scott Free Productions, for another feature set in the same universe as the video games. The web-movie features Mike Colter, who is set to play Luke Cage in the titular upcoming Netflix series, follows Jameson Locke as he and a ragtag team of soldiers investigate a terrorist attack in one of their bases, and go on a race for survival in a Halo. Halo: Nightfall received similar criticisms to those of Forward Unto Dawn.



In the similar style of other anime anthology tie-ins of other movies such as Animatrix and Batman: Gotham Knight, Halo Legends is the final known Halo feature made into a movie. A mixture of various anime styles orchestrated by an assortment of notable anime companies, Halo Legends received mixed reviews again, with many citing the uneven storytelling as its biggest fault.

Well that took longer than expected yet again. So much for keeping things short. Anyway, to conclude our post, please enjoy this Machinima, a video genre that utilizes original video game content, graphics and characters included, and are used to create original content, of Halo, and none of them cannot be complete without channel Rooster Teeth's comedy series, Red vs. Blue. Here is their latest episode and watch it below.  Also for those who are asking, I highly doubt that we would continue the "Who's Who in Spider-Man: Homecoming?", now that about half of the cast has already been confirmed with roles. Stay tuned for more Dateline Movies!

Source

DISCLAIMER: Halo and all related elements are properties of Bungie and 343 Industries, a subsidiary of Microsoft Studios, with the film Halo's Script and Story Ideas are properties conceived by Alex Garland. This post is strictly for entertainment and informational purposes only, and is under the "fair use" category". No copyright infringement intended.

Wednesday, August 24, 2016

Drug Deal Scenario Using 160 Movie Titles


We are sharing to you another great video that we have found in the Internet wherein all the dialogues between the characters are all titles of movies.  This time the scene is about a drug deal between a user and a pusher.  This video was made by Fine Brothers Entertainment and about 160 movie titles were mentioned.  



We have posted a similar video way back in 2014 and this is the supposed sequel of that said video.  The first video was titled Breakup! and it uses 154 movie titles.  Hope that you enjoyed it as much as we do!

Saturday, August 20, 2016

Dateline Movies Goes To Repertory Philippines' Hansel and Gretel


Hansel & Gretel

Play Dates: August 13, 2016 - December 15, 2016

Genre/s: Adventure, Comedy, Fantasy, Family and Children

Presented by Repertory Philippines

Writers: Erwin Fajardo, Joy Virata and Sach Castillo

Director: Joy Virata

Starring:
  • Allen Orolfo/Joshue Nubla/Mari Yapjoco/Nathan Flores/Tory Cortez  as Hansel
  • Ashlee Factor/Ella Gonzales/Michelle Cornejo/Rayne Cortez as Gretel
  • Bituin Escalante/Carla Guevarra-Laforeza/Christine Flores as Rosina, The Witch
  • Chino Verguillas/Vien Alen King as The Sandman

Hooray for another play review! Last weekend, me and the rest of the Martinez family battled metropolitan traffic, heavy rain and the confusing parking system to get to the premiere of Hansel and Gretel, the latest feature by Repertory Philippines, which is co-sponsored by Republic Biscuit Corporation, makers of the delicious Hansel Biscuits. Nothing screams "clever promotion" more than this one. Also, for those who are asking, no, this has nothing to do with Hansel and Gretel: Witch Hunters starring Jeremy Renner and Gemma Arterton. Anyway, let us get to our review of Hansel and Gretel, and while you are reading this post, book your tickets right now and see this play as soon as possible. No need to worry, you have about a few more months to find time.


What is the play about?

Based on the beloved Brothers Grimm written children's tale of the same name, and adapted from famed composer Engelbert Humperdinck's opera of also the same name, we follow the two children in an all-too familiar adventure of old age whimsy and some added charm to boot. Siblings Hansel, played by Orolfo (Jack and the Beanstalk), Nubla (Be Careful With My Heart), Yapjoco (Noli Me Tangere The Musical), Nathan Flores (Alice in Wonderland), or Cortez T., and Gretel, played by Factor (The Secret Garden), Gonzales (Peter Pan), Cornejo (Revolting Children) or Rayne Cortez (appearing in Jewel of the Antilles with Tory Cortez) are tasked by their parents to take a small trek through the woods to pick-up some berries. Unbeknownst to them, the neighboring forest is a very dangerous place to venture through, as the infamous witch known as Rosina, played by Escalante (Stepping Out), Guevarra-Laforeza (Saturday Night Fever) or Christine Flores (A Christmas Carol) lives there.



As the kids go deeper, and deeper into the forest, and after falling asleep due to a long day of walking, and the spell of the fabled Sandman, played by Verguillas (A Midsummer Night's Dream) or King (Marco Polo: An Untold Love Story) Hansel and Gretel discover a house constructed of pure sugary treats, which for some reason is not being eaten by animals, specifically ants. (Seriously, if I found that house anywhere near my neighborhood, I would eat the whole structure in a heartbeat.) With a single glare, Hansel and Gretel give into their innermost cravings and decide to indulge in the sweet delight that is the gingerbread cookie-crisped dessert of a household. Unfortunately, for the two youngsters, they are caught in what is actually the lair of the sinister witch herself (Gasp!). With the witch aiming to make a meal out of them, the two must evade capture and return to their home in one piece!

What we think of the play?

Okay, okay. It is a family-oriented adaptation of a famous children's fairy tale. As such, I am not expecting a modern complexity of a play that would be mentioned as the Modern Prometheus of the generation, or the play of the century, or anything of the like. In addition, the source material itself is not particularly new theater material. It is fairly simple, although commendable in its presentation of a very straightforward story. However, immediately dismissing a story for its overly simplistic structure would be biased of me. With an open mind, I was able to discover a very entertaining family-friendly fare.



The color, the costumes, the dialogue, they all have awaken the inner child in me that has long been forgotten due to high school life. That inner child sparked like a firework, to the point that me and my sister laughed a little too hard at some bits of the play as we constantly relate the play to our lives. But seriously, the play is good. Yes, like I said before, this is not your typical William Shakespeare-esque project, but there is something about the play that will make you watch.


The production value of the play is really, really neat. I mean, look at their costumes, is it not the most accurate portrayal of fairy tale characters? It is sad when you see that about half of the movies adapting these typical children's tale are endlessly re-imagining everything. Why the sudden requirement for a dark and brooding take on simple tales is what I will never understand.


The acting is a very good highlight here, especially Bituin Escalante's performance as Rosina, The Witch. Here, from the play we watched last weekend, Escalante delivered a sharp and energetic wicked witch act while still maintaining a malevolent presence to reckon with. The acting is backed by well polished choreography, filled with nimble and rhythmic steps that properly reflect the joyful vibe the play is aiming to instill. She also made it as my highlight of the play because of how she answered an audience member, a young girl, who was asking how to avoid the wicked witch, to which Escalante answers, "If you obey your parents, I won't come for you.". That was awesome. I cannot remember the exact words but what I just typed are pretty close.


While the story is indeed predictable, it still had its interesting moments, such as that part when Hansel and Gretel attempt to eat the house, but are frequently foiled again and again by the snooping witch. However, story and stage time-wise, questions as to the actual role of  wizard, who is actually the Sandman in the story and the Dawn Fairy, played by Cara Barredo (Rent), or Sweet Buchanan (The Baker's Wife), remained in my mind. I was expecting to see the famous "leaving a trail of breadcrumbs" part but I didn't see it. Is that not an important part of the story? It was explained by the Director though during the question and answer portion that it was not included in the Engelbert Humperdinck opera which they chose to adapt. Despite these, you and your family will still be in for a wonderful experience.

All-in-all, Hansel and Gretel is a very funny and worthy family-friendly entertainment. 

And that is where we conclude our review.  Stay tuned for more Dateline Movies!

Friday, August 19, 2016

How Far Would You Go To Hide The Truth? - BROKEN VOWS

Just how far would one person go to hide the truth? Well, it has been a long time indeed since we posted something. Thankfully for me, my two stressful exam and project weeks are now behind me, and we can return to posting posts here in Dateline Movies. For our currently fourth blog post for the month of August, we return with a new movie promotional material that is definitely worth your time. In the vein of other famous stalker-centric thrillers such as One Hour Photo and Play Misty For Me, newcomer director Bram Coppens and Solar Pictures proudly present Broken Vows.


Broken Vows (2016)

Rated NR: This film currently has no rating.

Genre/s: Drama, Romance, Thriller

This film is to be released on September 28, 2916 (PH Release Date; Limited Release Only)

Presented by Lionsgate and Solar Pictures

Director: Bram Coppens

Writers: Jim Agnew, Sean Keller

Starring: 
  • Wes Bentley as Patrick
  • Jaimie Alexander as Tara
  • Cam Gigandet as Michael
  • Alexandra Breckenridge as Debra

What is the movie about?

Tara, played by Alexander (Thor) is set to be wed to his fiance Michael, played by Gigandet (Easy A). With approval from her parents, all seems to be going very well for Tara, until one night, a chance encounter would send her entire life down the drain.

While Tara joins her friends, including her best friend Debra, played by Breckenridge (The Walking Dead), on a bachelorette party in New Orleans, Tara instantly becomes enchanted at the sight of a bartender named Patrick, played by Bentley (American Horror Story), whose hypnotic charms hopelessly casts Tara under a spell.


source
After a night of passion, Tara realizes her mistake too late, as she decides to leave and return to Michael, but their indecent affair awakens something within Patrick that she never knew would soon break free, something deadly. Now hellbent on making Tara his and his alone, Patrick will have to do everything in his power, even if it means getting Michael out of the picture.

Hey, you were asking for a short post? You got it! Be sure to catch Broken Vows in cinemas near you on September 28, 2016. Up next, that Halo-related Inside post is finally on the way. Aside from a Fantastic Four Reboot movie review, we might get another Inside The Trash Bin post about the first and unreleased Fantastic Four movie, made only to keep those film-rights away from Marvel, in preparation for an upcoming documentary about said film titled "Doomed". And yes, more DC Inside The Trash Bin spotlights, specifically starting with arguably the most notable cancelled Superman movie, Superman Lives. Man, Hollywood has a lot of trash to reuse. Also, to be fair with DC Comics, we'll have an editorial about Marvel Studios. Lastly, are you up for a history lesson? With Sausage Party making some impressions, let us take a look at how adult animation influenced the modern cinema. Stay tuned for more Dateline Movies!


Wednesday, August 10, 2016

Why (Almost) Everyone Hates The Ghostbusters Reboot? (And How To Fix The Issues)

Source, "Who You Gonna Call?"
Welcome to the modern age of cinema, wherein old, classic, legendary masterpieces are set for supposedly updated revisions for the most unnecessary purposes possible. From completely unoriginal theatrical takes on your favorite cult classics such as the RoboCop reboot, and much more unoriginal television adaptations such as Damien, not a single film is safe from gaining a second silver screen life. Last month, audiences saw the release of a female-led Ghostbusters reboot, with critics unexpectedly praising the film, but not as much praise as the original movies. However, while critics shower some praise for the movie, audiences remain skeptic and completely unconvinced that the reboot is not worth a single dime. With critics and audiences once more divided on their opinions, Dateline Movies dissects these concerns piece-by-piece, again from both the perspectives of both a critic and a moviegoer, and provide solutions for them to avoid if ever anybody is going to do another reboot. Also, in case if you are asking, no we still have not watched the reboot yet, but I will just wait until it hits basic cable with an open mind.


Source, New Team, New Movie
1. Forced Political Agenda Feels Forced (Gender Bending)


Do you know that feeling when you are indulging yourself with a very delicious food but you are unable to truly enjoy it because there are flies constantly buzzing all over you? Well, forced diversity in movies, especially for die-hard movie fans such as us, it feels basically like that scenario. While everyone is up for some much needed diversity, nobody will enjoy something that is only made just to cater to others' needs at the sacrifice of an overall high-quality movie. This issue, which is pretty much getting all too familiar, is one of the many reasons why many audiences are much more annoyed than enthused for a movie, and is a clear warning sign that a lot of movies are much more keen on getting box office returns than delivering good entertainment. While the movie itself was praised, Star Trek Beyond can be an example because it experienced some diversity-related controversy when they made fan-favorite character Sulu gay. In addition, no one, and I mean no one, likes double standards, especially if a film starring women is being promoted. Just because some of us are simply not that excited for the flick's release does not make us sexist.

The Solution: Let us all be honest here. An all-female Ghostbusters movie does sound somewhat interesting on paper and pen, as this can be a potential gateway for more stories to explore. And yes, we really could use some more female protagonists on the big screen, and that is a very good idea! However, do not just create gender-bent characters for the sake of promoting a political agenda. Something that is forced onto a movie will always end-up being its gravest weak point. If they really do want to promote diversity, the writers should make it feel natural and necessary, and while some may remain doubtful, it will be easier for the world at large to open-up to the new Ghostbusters.


Source, "Answer The Call!"
2. Pretty Please, Just Stop With The Reboots!


Seriously, reboots are at this point more or less an attempt to earn a box office jackpot than a worthy remaster of a cinematic marvel. While there have obviously been really great reboots, not because of the source material that they used but rather due to how much they put onto the table, we can all admit that about a lot of them are just really, really bad. Now, this is where the flick received about a half of its negative feedback from audiences. Rebooting a movie, especially if it is a classic movie, will ruffle plenty of feathers. Take The Amazing Spider-Man series as an example. That film series had the potential to be a good reboot, but it only retold the exact same story with some mediocre additions. Also, does a reboot not consider all the time and effort made by the original creators of their craft wasted?

The Solution: While reboots do offer much more creative freedom for the new staff to work on, why not just make it a continuation of the original film series instead of changing everything that everyone of us know and love? Would that not be a better alternative? Just imagine. What if the original Ghostbusters have retired, and they passed-on the mantles to their protegees? That would be very great for a movie, and it will not do anything to desecrate the original works. Also, didn't Dan Aykroyd made a script for a Ghostbusters sequel? Why not just use that as a basis for the film, and just add some tweaks here and there? And speaking of a canceled Ghostbusters movie, I tried to find the script itself, but to no avail. Here is hoping that we could feature that in a post.

Source, You Know There's A Problem When The Number of Dislikes Overshadow The Amount of Likes

3. A Really Terrible First Impression (Including The Soundtrack)


"Beauty is in the eye of the beholder", and this beauty will often be based on first impressions. Just like in the world of movies, trailers and teasers are released through the Internet for, as a fellow user once wrote, "the audience to get a taste of what the movie has in store, as well as for them to give initial judgments". I do not exactly remember the entire phrase, but whatever it is that I typed, it still has the same meaning, and what we said is rightfully so. The first teaser for Ghostbusters was met with a universal dislike, even going as far as to get the nickname of the "Most Disliked Video on YouTube". It is very evident here that the film suffered another major marketing problem with the quality of the trailer. Based on some YouTube comments of the video, users are automatically turned-down due to the corny jokes and unpolished computer generated imagery, with some of them already hating the movie ever since the news surfaced on the Sony Hack event. The soundtrack does not sort things out either, as Fall Out Boy and Missy Elliot's version of the memorable Ray Parker Jr.-made theme song is met with a mixed reception.

The Solution: You know what? They really should just hire a better marketing staff. Like  what we said on our caption above, there is automatically a problem when the amount of dislikes outweigh the number of likes. Had they have a much more responsible and a much more serious team, the trailer would have been met with a much more positive feedback. In addition, it is very clear that the jokes itself could use some polishing, which we would talk about in the next section. While I am not saying the soundtrack is that bad (I would rate it a 5/10), they should at least make some tunes that are of course modern, but at least open to all audiences. This soundtrack smells too much of a modern teenage spirit for me.


Source, "The Power of Patty Compels You!"
4. A Lack of Original and Humorous Jokes


Jokes are the very essence of a comedy film, because if it was a comedy movie but there was an obvious joke void, then I must be watching boring lecture on video. Most of the jokes that you would usually hear in the movie are either juvenile, which includes gross-out humor that would appeal to the teenage demographic, referential, which includes mentions or specific name-drops of various media figures, or visual, which involves sight gags. All of which are decent and all. Without the intelligence needed to keep things in perspective, these jokes would rather make audiences' eyes roll. The trailer, as we said before, did not entirely cause belly laughs, because the jokes themselves are, in the eyes of audiences everywhere, corny and lazily executed.

The Solution: Well, this is very simple and pretty obvious enough, hire writers who really know how to make a joke, and not just simply rely on usual gimmicks such as one-liners. But then again, that is only based on what we have seen on the trailer (Again, I still have not watched this yet). Given that Paul Feig has made some particularly funny movies recently, the reboot seems to be in the right hands, I guess. Still, these are useful reminders to follow.

Man, I hope that we are not ripping-off Cinema Sins in any form, given that we seem to be finding some flaws and providing some solutions that may or may not be beneficial. (They are an awesome channel by the way.) Also, thank goodness for a no-school day. If it weren't for this day, we would not have another post, but it is still pretty sad that today was our third examination day. Well, there goes my long weekend. Up next, something that involves original songs for movies, some animated movie reviews, and some short posts probably. Before we exit, here are some songs from the Ghostbusters reboot. My sister likes them, but like I said, they are not my type of music. We also added the original theme song for good measure. Stay tuned for more Dateline Movies!

Saturday, August 6, 2016

Why Critics Hate The DC Extended Universe? (And How To Fix The Issues)

Source, One Franchise To Battle The Marvel Cinematic Universe
Suicide Squad is now showing, and no, I am still currently preoccupied with our upcoming examinations to watch the movie with my family. However, I do get the liberty of surfing through the Internet to find some interesting news bits surrounding the said film. And to my surprise, Suicide Squad is receiving a handful of negative reviews, which makes this movie the third consecutive DC Extended Universe movie not to be praised entirely. Although fans are loving the film, critics say that the story is incoherent and the editing is choppy, but the acting is on-point. Fans of DC Comics are critical about the outcome, and they even went as far as to actually start a petition to shut down Rotten Tomatoes, until the one who started the trend put a halt to the appeal.

Personally I have high expectations for Suicide Squad, and there is definitely no doubt that I will watch and enjoy the movie, just like what we did in Batman v. Superman: Dawn of Justice, but there is no denying that there are some reasons as to why critics are often keen on lambasting DC Movies recently. For our first editorial in a long while, Dateline Movies will carefully analyze the roots of this outcome, from both a critic's and a moviegoer's perspective, and provide solutions that will address these concerns.

Source, Green Lantern is Probably Taking A Day Off
1. Too Much Focus On The Future (Rushed Story Arcs)

DC Extended Universe does have an interesting future that lies ahead of them, especially since that DC Comics has a large vault of jaw-dropping stories and potentially amazing characters that are just waiting to be adapted to the big screen. With Justice League and Wonder Woman just a few months away, fans are already hoarding their money just to see the flicks. However, if you are focusing too much on the future, then you are severely sacrificing the quality of your stories. Not simply just the stories, but the overall value of the movie. While I believe there is a necessity to set-up upcoming films, as well as to keep the audience's enthusiasm afloat, it really should not be much of a priority to begin with. This crime against rational storytelling is made unbelievably evident in the franchise's second installment, Batman v. Superman: Dawn of Justice which, even though it is still entertaining in its own right, features not-so subtle set-ups. The movie lost focus as about a quarter of the movie is dedicated in debuting upcoming movies, including the Flash, Cyborg and Aquaman. DC, nevertheless, is not the only one committing this sin, as Marvel Studios has done this before in Avengers: Age of Ultron.

The Solution: We propose a rather very simple solution to patch-up all the damages in the forthcoming installments. Keep the screenwriters heads "now-oriented", which means that they should put much more emphasis on fleshing-out their already established characters, and save the rest, including future villains, for further flicks. The movie Man of Steel received the most positive reviews among all three currently released installments because it remained focused on Superman alone. In addition, never assume that the audiences will simply accept the plot holes brought upon by the screenplay's unfocused narrative, because they will not.

Source, This is Not Your Typical Superman, Alright!

2. Being Really Dark Does Not Equal To Being Really Delightful


It is not a capital sin to make a movie serious or dark in tone, as the darkness that surrounds any movie will definitely give the viewers enough tension to root for the protagonist even more. A dark tone will also be good to instill thought-provoking moments, as through this, the audiences will want to see more until the very end. However, being overly serious is just like that pessimistic friend of yours who keeps on exploring the negative side, and constantly says "Life is bad. Period.". I learned from my Filipino Language teacher recently that every once in a while, you have to make a joke or two, and he is right. But this is not to say that every superhero movie has to be a comedy, because we all know how that feels. Remember, a lot of the audiences who watch superhero movies are youngsters, and it would be bad for business if about half of the audiences are alienated from your movie.

The Solution: I once read an opinion piece in a comment thread, where a DC and Marvel fan war is commencing, that DC should remember to "be dark, but fun to watch". Those are words to live by in the film-making industry. Although we are not advising to have every dialogue in DC's films to be exclusively corny one-liners, but there should be at least one enlightening line that does not affect the overall tone of the movie. Marvel has frequently done this in their films with the exception of yet again Avengers: Age of Ultron for putting a lot of boring quips.

Source, Jesse Eisenberg Better Fits As The Riddler
3. Inaccurate Portrayal of Characters (Questionable Casting)

One of the most important things to consider when adapting a comicbook to the big screen is how should the characters be portrayed, and more particularly, who would portray these characters. DC has had some very interesting and successful castings recently, including Ben Affleck as a brooding Batman, and Gal Gadot as an enigmatic Wonder Woman. Suicide Squad, as previously mentioned, has a spectacular cast. However, having Jesse Eisenberg, a fairly decent actor, portray a cartoonish, wise-cracking Lex Luthor, and having no resemblance to the comicbook character, was seen by fans and critics as one of Dawn of Justice's weak points. Man of Steel was met with some criticism for having Superman, who is noted for not killing his enemies, brutally kill General Zod at the ending, as well as having almost no regard for others. While it is not strange for a movie to create their own versions of certain characters (I actually see this as a unique portrayal, albeit tiresome), changing almost everything except the name is a timebomb waiting to detonate.

The Solution: Simply sticking to what is already established and notable is already a solution. Given that there are already a million pages worth of basis to understand the characters, why is there a need for change? It should be noted that DC and Warner Bros. is clearly attempting to create something different and unexpected, but at the very least they should have maintained the essence of the characters. As what my Dad would always say, "Why change something that does not need changing?", or in another quotation, "If it ain't broke, don't fix it".


Source, Director Zack Snyder
4. A Lack of Writers and Directors With Prior Comic Knowledge

There is this quote that says "The hand that rocks the cradle, rules the world", and it has some sort of connection to our topic. The two most valuable parts of a film-craft crew are the director and the writer. The writer is the one who creates the story, from start to finish, while the director is the one that leads the movie to the right direction. If both are either absent or useless, then the movie is surely doomed from the start. Zack Snyder, the director of Man of Steel, is hated by DC for not relying on the source material. While he is noted for directing other comicbook adaptations such as Watchmen and 300, Snyder is also known for focusing way too much on visual imagery over logical storytelling. To formulate a proper adaptation, a passionate set of members must be present, for this shows that all of those involved in the project know what they are doing.

The Solution: We are not in any way suggesting to expel Zack Snyder from the franchise, as he still deserves credit for one of the people jump-starting the entire universe in the first place. Instead, we suggest that Zack Snyder should make use of his intriguing visual tastes with proper comicbook knowledge. This way, he will get a better understanding on his craft. In addition, Snyder should learn to collaborate with those who actually know the characters he is handling, especially with the screenwriters. Having Patty Jenkins helm Wonder Woman, Ben Affleck in a solo Batman film, and James Wan in Aquaman is a very good start, as these directors know the characters by heart. Also, why not ask writers from DC Comics to pen some scripts for them, given that they are already writing stories for the characters?

Source, Smile For The Camera
5. A Lack of True Leadership (Corporate Meddling)


Do any of you still remember the major box office car crash that was the Fantastic Four reboot? Unfortunately, we all do, because not only are we going to be reviewing it in another post, the reboot is one of the few instances corporate meddling was very evident behind the scenes. Yes, we know that there should be at least someone to keep the crewmates in line, but it is an absolute "do not" as more meddling will mean more problems, and more problems mean inevitable critical disaster. When a studio removes the creative freedom of the director, who we previously mentioned is being the one to lead the project, and/or the writer, then the essence of the concept will be gone in an instant. Besides, what will be the point of hiring a director and a writer if you are just going to edit-out all of their efforts? Recent news states that a lot of Jared Leto's Joker scenes were removed under orders from the studio's head, and that the story for Suicide Squad was rushed for completion. This is a clear sign that DC Comics needs someone, not just anyone, who can lead the franchise at the correct course.

The Solution: Marvel Studios has only one public figure who mostly calls the shots, and that executive producer Kevin Feige. Through Kevin Feige, the schedule of all their movies, as well as other plans, are noticeably organized and laid-out properly. He does not do this alone, however, as he also has consultants and sub-division heads to keep the entire project alive and well. DC Comics is in dire need of someone who can set things in order, and who can prevent studios from editing-out their crafts. Through this, their movies will be able to avoid deleting crucial scenes from the theatrical cut, and the pure essence of the flicks will still remain intact. Releasing an uncut, straight-to-video version of their films is also a good alternative, as this can help with regaining lost profits and redeeming their fans' favor. However, this should not happen every after movie, as audiences will become more and more impatient to purchase these "Ultimate Cuts", and might possibly be considered a modus operandi by now.

Well that was longer than I expected. I hope that DC Comics will be able to get their head straight soon, and finally deliver another amazing cinematic universe. I just hope the movie is not as bad as they say, but I will still watch it next week. Up next, we will be discussing in another editorial a particularly hated reboot. You guessed it, it is Ghostbusters, and let us see why everyone hates it so much. We already said that we will be reviewing the Fantastic Four reboot, and a review shall come! Also, some interesting cancelled movies which we are hoping to complete within the month. I guess that is all for now, and before we leave, here are some Suicide Squad songs, straight from the movie. Stay tuned for more Dateline Movies!