Pages

Thursday, May 25, 2017

Movie Review: La La Land

Source
La La Land (2016)

Rated PG-13: For Mild Language

Genre/s: Comedy, Drama, Musical, Romance

Released on December 9, 2016 (US Release Date; Available For Worldwide Viewing)

Presented by Summit Entertainment, Black Label Media, TIK Films, Impostor Pictures, Gilbert Films, and Marc Platt Productions

Writer and Director: Damien Chazelle

Starring:
  • Ryan Gosling as Sebastian Wilder
  • Emma Stone as Mia Dolan

True love? Ha, don't make me laugh. Ever since the first trailer was released, my movie-addicted side was already itching, since it was directed by the gentleman who gave us Whiplash. In addition, it is a musical, and who does not love a good musical movie? During the recent Academy Awards ceremony, after earning a huge set of major accolades from several categories (Wow, Hollywood really does love movies about Hollywood), it was this movie that was revealed to be the winner of the title of "Best Picture" for this year. And yes this movie did deserve this ... oh wait. My bad. It turns out Moonlight won. Oops. But still, this movie was still decent in its own right. Welcome to Dateline Movies, and join us as we review La La Land. Here's to the fools who dream!


Source

What is the movie about?

Welcome to the "City of Stars", contemporary Los Angeles, where the music is lively, and the people have ambitions in the world of performing arts. Everyone here has dreams, but sometimes, it takes a certain moment in time, or a certain someone, for us to truly realize what we really want in our lives.

Mia Dolan, played by Stone, is just your average waitress working in a major movie production studio with aspirations to become an actress, while Sebastian Wilder, played by Gosling (Both Gosling and Stone appeared in two other films before, Crazy, Stupid, Love, and Gangster Squad) is just your average jazz-obsessed musician trying to find the right type of work for him to pursue his passion.

Together, they will form a romantic relationship that will stood the test of time, but amidst the abundance of disappointments and shortcomings when it comes to passion, can their love surpass all odds? Will they love each other forever, even when the music stops playing?


Source
Acting = (5/5)

If you have watched all of the two movies that both Ryan Gosling and Emma Stone worked on, with all three movies coincidentally featuring them always as couples, then you know you are in for some seriously sweet, romantic moments, as well as tear-jerking moments, and these are things you get in this movie. Seriously, their chemistry is so believable, and it is flawless.

For me, both of the two leads are really just spectacular in each of their respective ways, but if I were to choose which among them did marginally, slightly better, I would have to go with Emma Stone, since her delivery as Mia Dolan is the one I find most easily relatable.

With Stone's easygoing nature, we get to see a rather depressing portrait of a lady caught under the shadow of another equally ambitious fellow, and with effortless charm, we are reminded that every failure is just a stepping stone. Her vocal work while singing, especially during the song "Audition (The Fools Who Dream)", also known as my favorite song in the entire soundtrack, is mind-blowing and beautiful.


Source
Of course, that is not to say that Ryan Gosling did not do a fantastic job. With his traditional deep-voiced and suave bravado, Gosling quickly embodies the soul of a man caught in the world that has long since forgotten jazz, and sets on a quest to reinvigorate interest in the classic music genre. He really knows how to charm an audience with just a simple smile and nod. I find it kind of funny that Gosling was supposed to be the Beast in the latest Beauty and the Beast remake, while Emma Watson was supposed to play Mia, but left for the aforementioned movie. Gosling might actually make a good Beast, given that he has a pretty smooth singing, slightly unsteady, but not that it matters, voice here.


Also, for a fairly short amount of screen time, John Legend, also an executive producer for the movie, is good as Keith. What a nice way to make use of that credit than make an appearance in the flick itself, am I right?

In addition, did anyone spot the J.K. Simmons (The Accountant) cameo in the movie? I guess you could say that he fired Sebastian from the club he manages, after playing different jazz melodies instead of Christmas tunes, is because it was "not his tempo", or even because he was either "rushing" or "dragging".


Source
Direction and Quality = (5/5)

This movie is nominated for the Best Picture category for a reason. Well, make that more than a reason. The way Chazelle, plus with the most eye-popping, non-CGI cinematography imaginable by Linus Sandgren, and editing by Tom Cross, captures each passing moment of the story in living, breathing color is just a sight to behold. I guess this movies just gives a "motion picture" a new meaning, huh? Some of my most favorite scenes, namely because of the gorgeous artistic lighting and coloring, include Sebastian and Mia's fantasy-induced trip to the Griffith Observatory, which includes a full set of stars on the background because this movie would not have had a song titled "City of Stars" without a sky full of stars, and Mia's alternate ending hallucination in the ending. These two key scenes will literally sweep you into the bittersweet world of La La Land.

And what good musical motion picture would there be without carefully timed and incredibly sharp dance sequences? This movie had some pretty darn good ones, in case I have not mentioned it yet. I believe the scene that contained the best choreography would have to be the introductory dance number, "Another Day of Sun", wherein we see random bystanders caught in your day-to-day Los Angeles traffic jam in a highway, on a warm sunny day. It immediately sets-up the bright and colorful mood the movie is aiming for. Sebastian and Mia's dance by the moonlight after their party, which showcases the song "A Lovely Night" , as well as the tap-dancing prowess of our two leads, comes close as second.


Source
But do you want to know what is, for me, the overall highlight of the movie? Well, if it is not obvious yet, it is the music. The catchy, upbeat, uplifting songs that not only make lip-sync out of nowhere at the mere opening beats, but also, with its astonishingly true-to-heart lyrical genius, inspire you upon closer inspection. The songs are the cherries to the metaphorical cake. Songs such as "Audition (The Fools Who Dream)", "City of Stars", and so much more will leave you breathless, and probably, like me, constantly listening to the soundtrack via your Spotify accounts.


Source
Story, Dialogue and Flow = (4/5)


Sigh. I sure do wish my love life could just be as splendid as that GIF shows.

Um, I mean ... Are you tired of the usual romantic flick formula? Is it too predictable for your tastes? Too much of the expected endings? Too simplistic? Too annoyed at the done-to-death "will they, won't they" tropes? Fear not, because La La Land manages to overcome at least some of the cliches, such as the "love triangle" and the "love at first sight", that you are sick of, just like me. Then again, we really cannot remove much of the elements that make up all of the other famous works of romance, because by removing those key components, then we are fast approaching a different genre.

For starters, similar to one of my other favorite movie of all time, 500 Days of Summer, which is also much more depressing than this movie, the movie injects some new bits and pieces to the formula. Some of the changes include non-physical sources of attraction for both characters, and the addition of slight social commentary with regards to the themes of "old versus new" through Sebastian's main conflict, and "dreams versus love", which is the prime concept revolving the movie. You do not need to read an entire thesis for you to explore various thought-provoking themes, and in this flick's case, it explores both topics through relatable, realistically down-to-Earth situations as presented in the story, such as Mia's attempts at getting accepted in auditions, and Sebastian's musically fueled passion.

I especially like, in a twisted sense, the argument between Sebastian and Mia later on in the movie, because while it is expected that they would fight soon, the topic of their fight is not on par with the basic causes such as "She/He loves me more than you", or "I just like you as a friend", or "You cheated on me!", but it does fall a little bit down on the second example.
Source
But, the only downside for the entire movie is that, by the time the romance starts to bloom, you might be bombarded with some exposition heavy lines, especially with regards to Mia's backstory and her motivations on her pursuit of an acting career. They are not that long, but for people who prefer more of the action-esque theatricality, you might need to be a bit patient.

However, despite that, as mentioned before, some of the dialogues mentioned by our two main characters can really, in a way, inspire you in your life, and in some part, think once or twice about your current relationship. This becomes much more evident during the fight that will eventually lead to the disintegration of Sebastian and Mia's relationship, wherein Mia thinks that Sebastian has sold-out his dream of opening a club, in favor of a career with his former classmate, Keith, played by John Legend (Soul Men), whereas Sebastian claims that Mia only liked him because she once had a more promising career than he did.


Source
Ending, Originality and Story Fulfillment = (5/5) +1

By the time the argument breaks out, and by that part, Mom was already fast asleep after finding the slower parts tiresome, which I sort-of agree on, it all seemed like it was going to be yet another happily ever after for Sebastian and Mia. Sebastian finally has a promising career with his fusion jazz band, which Mia accepts, whilst Mia is about to rise to stardom with an upcoming movie that she is going to star in, despite her one-woman play being a failure.

But all of a sudden ... boom! Fast forward five years later, Mia has a child now, and a different husband? Okay, I expected this ending because about half my friends at school already spoiled the ending to me, but still, even if I know how it ends, there is this one bit that I was not aware of that makes the ending effective and moving.

Blah, blah, blah ... another traffic jam ... blah, blah, blah ... stop-over, but where exactly? Sebastian's club, with the sign designed by Mia hanging outside, of all the places in Los Angeles. As they glance at each other for awhile, and Sebastian proceeds to perform, causing Mia to fantasize what could have been had they continued on five years from then.


Source
Remember when I said that Mia's alternate ending fantasy was one of my favorite scenes? Cross that, my favorite scene, to be more exact, aside from Mia's finally successful audition. This is why, and I did say that I loved the cinematography. However, what I love more about this sequence is the message that it carries, which is, in the end, reminding us that we should never overlook the things that really matter to us, and not push them all away in favor of ambitions, because the things, and especially people, that matter most to you, are the ones that make you happy.

Overall, watching this movie was a rewarding experience. Sure it is slow in some parts, given that it is a romantic movie, but like the poetic mastermind Chazelle is behind the camera, you will be spellbound by the wonderful message, aside from the awesome musical segments, that the movie is giving you, and like Whiplash, it will inspire you.

Overall Evaluation = (5/5)

With lovable chemistry and performances from both Ryan Gosling and Emma Stone, as well as Damien Chazelle's, heartfelt direction and Justin Herwitz top-notch compositions, this movie is a must see!

TOTAL = 25/25 (Masterpiece)

La La land, a beautifully shot and choreographed musical with a sweet romantic atmosphere, and emotional performances, will leave you singing your heart out, and dancing like there is no tomorrow.


Source
They do not make movies this good that much these days, but I am not gonna lie, at first, I had some mix feelings for the movie, but after digging deeper into the movie's inner workings, and of course, thanks in part to that wonderful sequence at the end, I was left amazed. It really is such a cinematic wonder to behold. It is okay La La Land cast and crew, even though you guys did not won the Best Picture award, the movie is still great! And with that comes the curtain call of our movie review of La La Land. Before leaving, please take the time to listen to three of my handpicked favorite songs from the movie. Stay tuned for more Dateline Movies!




Wednesday, May 24, 2017

Movie Review: Watchmen

Source
Watchmen (2009)

Rated R: For Intense Violence, and Strong Explicit Content and Language

Running Time: 163 minutes (2 hours and 43 minutes)

Genre/s: Action, Adaptation, Drama, Mystery, Science Fiction, Superhero


Released on March 6, 2009 (US Release Date; Available For Worldwide Viewing)

Presented by Warner Bros. Pictures, Paramount Pictures, Legendary Pictures, DC Comics, and Lawrence Gordon Productions

Based on the comicbook mini-series "Watchmen" written by Alan Moore and illustrated by Dave Gibbons

Writers: David Hayter and Alex Tse

Director: Zack Snyder

Starring:
  • Malin Åkerman as Laurie Juspeczyk / Silk Spectre II
  • Billy Crudup  as Doctor Jon Osterman / Doctor Manhattan
  • Matthew Goode as Adrian Veidt / Ozymandias
  • Carla Gugino as Sally Jupiter / Silk Spectre I
  • Jackie Earle Haley as Walter Kovacs / Rorschach
  • Jeffrey Dean Morgan as Edward Blake / The Comedian
  • Patrick Wilson as Daniel Dreiberg / Nite Owl II
Source 1, Source 2, Source 3
Alan Moore is one of my all-time favorite comicbook writers, and his work here in this phenomenal superhero antithesis mini-series, as well as his other works such as V For Vendetta and The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen, shows that he is a different kind of brilliant. His popular run on Swamp Thing is also an honorable mention. It is because that he has written a large assortment of memorable, and at times, controversial stories that Hollywood wants to get their grubby mittens on a lot of his intellectual properties. And failure after failure, bomb after bomb, Moore has since decided to not take credit from any other adaptations of his works (except for the episode "For The Man Who Has Everything" in Justice League Unlimited). However, this movie is far from being one of the worst attempts at adapting a work by Moore. I really love this movie, as evidenced by the fact that we did include in our Top Seven Most Favorite Movies of All Time countdown. With the source material being eyed for a potential television program, we should probably take a look at this movie again. This is Dateline Movies, and today, we will review one of the most comic-accurate adaptation in history, Watchmen! This is my last spoiler warning, by the way. I am just getting too lazy to type that word again in each movie review. (Laughter)


Source
But before anything else, since we are reviewing a flick directed by Zack Snyder, let us take the time to send our prayers to him and his family, which was a coincidence since I was already working on this by the time the news reached me. We just received word yesterday that Snyder lost his daughter, Autumn, last March, and has since stepped down as director for the upcoming Justice League movie, having The Avengers director Joss Whedon take over post-production. In addition, other bits and pieces of tragic news have been flooding my Facebook feed, including the bombing in Manchester, and Syria, and the chaos that is happening in our country, The Philippines, at this moment, specifically in Marawi City. We also just lost legendary James Bond actor Roger Moore at the age of eighty-nine last night. Our hearts and thoughts go out to all the families affected, and may you find hope, wherever you are.

Source

What is the movie about?

It is the nineteen-eighties, and in an alternate world full of non-superpowered heroes, and one who does, the threat of a nuclear apocalypse is extremely imminent. Their heydays are behind them, after a law is passed. The heroes no longer fight crime, and they now live the remainders of their lives as average, everyday citizens, but that does not mean they should, not at a time like this.

October 12th 1985. Tonight, a comedian, or more specifically the infamous Edward Blake, The Comedian, played by Morgan (The Walking Dead), died in New York, and in the words of violent masked vigilante Rorschach, played by Haley, "Somebody knows why ... somebody knows".

To solve this murder mystery, Rorschach seeks information from his former partner-in-crime-fighting, the second Nite Owl, played by Wilson (Both Haley and Wilson appeared in Little Children), godlike government asset Doctor Manhattan, played by Crudup (Alien: Covenant), the second Silk Spectre, played by Åkerman (The Heartbreak Kid), daughter of the original, played by Gugino (Sin City), and high-profile corporate head Ozymandias, played by Goode (The Imitation Game). "Who watches the Watchmen?"

Source
What we think of the movie?

Acting = (5/5)

I have no words exactly to describe the excellence of the cast's performance. I cannot think of anything wrong about their performances. They are just awesome in their roles. Okay fine, it has been a long time since I have actually watched the movie in my DVD, and yes, I just skim through online notes for me to recall certain parts of the movie (I mean, hey, I have the attention span of an adolescent male who indulges in things that does not feel like chores), but during my second viewing way back when, the flick caught me spellbound.

My most favorite among these performances is none other than Jackie Earle Haley grandiose standout act as the morally ambiguous Rorschach. Among all of
the movies that he has worked in that I am aware of, which are few including the RoboCop Reboot and London Has Fallen, this has got to be the highlight of his career. With zero effort, Haley manages to embrace the darkness that follows Rorschach journey for justice, and in scenes such as the prison interrogation, wherein we learn about Rorschach's tragic origins, and the ending, wherein he demands Doctor Manhattan to kill him if they ever want to keep their secret a secret permanently, that really show Haley's acting talents. "I'm not locked in here with you, you're locked in here with me!" Oh man, that was awesome delivery!

Source
I would give these two next performances a tie. Billy Crudup's coldly charming portrayal of Doctor Manhattan, and Jeffrey Dean Morgan's delightfully sadistic portrait of The Comedian. Both character depictions shown with major personality flaws, with Doctor Manhattan becoming more and more detached from human emotion, and The Comedian just being a total sociopath, and the charisma of both actors help make these two characters likable. Now that I thought about it, Jeffrey Dean Morgan would make a great Flashpoint Batman (let us just say a Batman who kills), and I can see why they cast Billy Crudup as The Flash's father in the movies, given that both characters know a thing or two about messing with time and space.

Patrick Wilson as a superhero missing the glory days, and is basically Mister Incredible from The Incredibles without the superpowers or the family dynamic, gives this movie some much needed heart. Scenes such as Nite Owl witnessing Rorschach's death at the hands of Doctor Manhattan, and his attempt at avenging his mentor's death caused by a local gang showcase Wilson's knack for dramatic roles.

Malin Åkerman, a heroine struggling to live in a world that looks down on heroes and continue the legacy of her mother, the original Silk Spectre, makes a compelling presentation, and her chemistry with both Doctor Manhattan and Nite Owl II is believable. Matthew Goode makes a good sympathetic villain in the form of Ozymandias, a hero with villainous plans, but noble intentions, and Carla Gugino is spot-on as Silk Spectre I, a former heroine disillusioned by her once insurmountable fame.

Source
Direction and Quality = (5/5)

I have to say, Zack Snyder definitely knows how to work around a camera. Combined with his usual array of visual trademarks such as slow-motion, unrelenting amounts of violence and gore, and unique color palettes, with impressive cinematography by Larry Fong, and editing by William Hoy, Watchmen is a sight to behold. I also admire Snyder's decision to make use of actual sets instead of computer-generated set pieces. It is a real breath of fresh air from the usual dizzying madness that we have already seen in other cinematic works.

The costume designs, by Michael Wilkinson, are wonderful. Each and everyone of them, except for Nite Owl's and Ozymandias', looks just as they are in the comics. It is a nice touch to keep Rorschach's mask movements intact. For Doctor Manhattan's expensive CGI look, it is just awesome. It must have been quite the challenge to pull that one objective off!

I do notice some of the major changes applied to the overall design of Nite Owl's suit, as well as Ozymandias' attire. For those who have seen their comicbook counterparts' costumes, you might notice that the Nite-Owl dons a much more Batman-inspired battle suit, while Ozymandias takes, a paraphrase of Snyder's words, a parody of the suits shown in the reviled Batman and Robin movie, almost entirely discarding the much more over-the-top owl-themed outfit and the emperor-like ensemble, respectively. Actually, as much as I would love to see similar garbs, I think we can all settle for the ones done for this movie, because admittedly, they would look kind of ridiculous on-screen, although I would have loved to see a much accurate costume for Ozymandias.


The movie also incorporates some great fight scenes, including The Comedian's murder, the assassination attempt on the life of Ozymandias, and the prison break scene. And whoever thought about the introductory sequence, featuring the history of the heroes through the decades, including the rise and fall of the once premiere team Minutemen, is awesome, and it really sets the dark and moody atmosphere for the rest of the flick.

Master scorer Tyler Bates is back again, and from what we have heard from Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2, we can already tell that he really knows how to make the perfect superhero movie sound when there is some noteworthy eighties songs in the track listing.

Also, this joke is getting repetitive, but was it even really necessary. Doctor Manhattan's ... ahem ... "lower parts" in each scene that he is in (except for the Vietnam War flashback)?


Source
Story, Dialogue and Flow = (3/5)

Confession, I did not actually read the original work, given that I am only a seventeen year old about to enter senior high and I still do not have a job to acquire income to make a purchase, so I rely mostly on Wikipedia to know more about the story. In addition, to help me get a greater insight on some of the more minor changes applied to the big screen adaptation, I had to watch CineFix's "What's The Difference?" video. So far, I can comment that the flick managed to add some pretty necessary changes to the story, and the results equal to much more layers of character developments.

Given the overall length of the story, an exact two-hour movie would not be made if every single bit remains. Some of these changes include the omission of the "Tales of the Black Freighter" sub-plot, a metafictional comicbook that draws parallels to that of Ozymandias' inner workings, such as motivations and his secret plan, character development progressions, and the ending. I am not going to elaborate on the ending just yet, due to obvious reasons, so stay tuned for that part.

Personally, I believe that it was alright to remove the "Tales of the Black Freighter" segment from the movie's story, since it would only slow things down even further, with the movie's pacing already being the most criticized aspect. However, while it is needed to completely justify Ozymandias' secret sinister plans, as it is in the comics, it does not fit in completely into the plot, similar to the additional backstories surrounding the complete Watchmen mythology.

And speaking of the film's duration, the movie does undeniably move in a relatively sluggish pace. There are just simply a lot of stories to go through, and from the perspective of people who have not read the comicbooks, such as me on my first viewing of the movie when I was only a nine-year old on video (I am kind of extreme in my movie tastes), there is just so much information to consume. I would agree with Terry Gilliam, one of the many directors who took a stab on the mini-series, that the source material would work better as television program. While I do appreciate the film for remaining incredibly faithful, maybe we could have trimmed a little bit of the story, but I am afraid that it might butcher the power that the comicbooks carried.

Source
I do not understand why some people are upset at Cold War backdrop, given that the comics is set in that time frame, although it would be interesting to see what would Watchmen look like in a much more modern context.

Also, I do like the addition of a sub-plot concerning energy. It is timely, similar to the story's main concept of the roles of superheroes in the real world, and it really does factor more into the ending, which makes it more sensible, compared to the one we saw in the comicbooks.

Source
Ending, Originality and Story Fulfillment = (5/5)

Arguably the biggest change applied to the story is the ending, wherein Ozymandias' original master plan of unleashing a genetically-altered giant squid on New York City with the hopes of uniting the worlds' leaders, has been changed slightly, by having Ozymandias create bombs everywhere with Doctor Manhattan's energy signature, effectively framing him, that alteration seemed necessary. To be honest, the late addition of a monstrous squid, created visually with the aid of the artist for "Tales of the Black Freighter" (?) felt out of place, and this new conclusion is better.

The ending still carries the exact same magic that the books showed, including Doctor Manhattan's suddenly regaining interest in humanity after getting to know more of Silk Spectre II's history of being the secret child of the original Silk Spectre and The Comedian, and the heroes keeping the revelation a secret, so as to preserve world peace. However, I agree with others when they say that the ending here is better, as the inclusion of having Nite-Owl watch Rorschach stick up to his beliefs is heartbreaking, given that the two are close allies and friends, and his reaction, punching Ozymandias to no expected results, is made all the more personal.

Overall, the ending, showing that Doctor Manhattan has since retreated to Mars once more, and the heroes continuing their adventures despite world peace, is awesome, and it hits all the right emotional notes, just like the books. Alan Moore should be proud of this movie. Yeah, I know what he feels about all of the adaptations of his works, but this one, this one he should definitely take a look.

Overall Evaluation = (4/5)

A panel-for-panel recreation of one of the most beloved comicbook series of all time, this extremely faithful adaptation delivers the wonder that fans love, but perhaps maybe too much of the wonder for some to appreciate.

TOTAL = 22/25 (Awesome!)

Watchmen might have been way too faithful to the source material, but with visually breathtaking direction and emotionally dramatic performances from its leads, it more than deserves your attention.


Source
This is such an underrated movie, and it deserves more respect than it does right now. I admire Zack Snyder for fully committing to this film. You can really feel that he truly loved the source material as much as we fans appreciate it. And that is it for our review of Watchmen. Before we officially conclude all of this, be sure to leave a like on our Facebook page by clicking here. Normally, we post videos at the end of our posts, but we just decided to save it for the next post. It has been a quite the week recently. Stay tuned for more Dateline Movies!

Monday, May 22, 2017

Movie Review: Ghost in the Shell (2017)

Source
Ghost in the Shell (2017)

Rated PG-13: For Mild Disturbing Imagery, Mild Sensitive Content and Violence

Running Time: 106 minutes (1 hour and 46 minutes)

Genre/s: Action, Adaptation, Adventure, Cyberpunk, Mystery, Science Fiction

Released on March 31, 2017 (US Release Date, Available For Worldwide Viewing)

Presented by Paramount Pictures, DreamWorks Pictures, Reliance Entertainment, Arad Productions, Shanghai Film Group Corporation, and Huahua Media

Based on the manga "Ghost in the Shell" by Masamune Shirow

Writers: Ehren Kruger, Jamie Moss, and William Wheeler

Director: Rupert Sanders

Starring:
  • Scarlett Johansson as Major Mira Killian / Motoko Kusanagi
  • "Beat" Takeshi Kitano as Daisuke Aramaki
  • Michael Carmen Pitt as Kuze / Hideo
  • Pilou Asbæk as Batou
  • Juliette Binoche as Doctor Ouelet
  • Peter Fedinando as Cutter


Speed Racer and Dragonball Evolution, two of Hollywood's really horrible attempts at adapting some of your fondest childhood memories, have set the bar for other manga and anime adaptions really low. Now, get ready to have one of the most beloved manga of all time receive the Hollywood makeover, but this time ... it is watchable, but still not on the "masterpiece" level. The weird thing about this movie is that I only became interested with it because of just how decent it looked, and also the whole casting controversy. I may not be the biggest manga or anime fan, with that honor going to some of my weeaboo "Suicide Squad-mates", but I do know a potentially great movie when I look at one, and this movie had loads of chances to be amazing. Welcome back to Dateline Movies, and this is our movie review of Ghost in the Shell, starring Scarlett Johansson. Spoilers, obviously.


What is the movie about?

In futuristic, dystopian Japan, which is strangely populated by people who are not Japanese, everyone has access to advanced technology in the form of "enhancements", bits and pieces of mad science that enable people to obtain new physical abilities and characteristics.

In this world, half-human, half-machine Major Mira Killian, played by Johansson (The Avengers), working closely with her trusted partner and confidant Bakou, played by Asbæk (Game of Thrones), under the leadership of Daisuke Aramaki, played by Kitano (Battle Royale), fights the growing crime wave as an agent of "Section 9". She has a past she cannot remember, and she feels as if she was never human to begin with.

One night, as supposed "glitches" of other memories start to surface, Mira encounters the mysterious cyber-terrorist Kuze, played by Pitt (I Origins), who is carrying a secret with regards to the Major, she must solve the mystery behind her creation, including her creators, Doctor Ouelet, played by Binoche (The English Patient), and Cutter, played by Ferdinando (High-Rise), and bring the true culprits in, but the truth might just be too much for her.

Source
What we think of the movie?

Acting = (3/5)

Scarlett Johansson is an awesome actress, and her performance as the main protagonist features her "action lady" persona that we are all familiar with, especially from her work in movies such as Lucy and as the deadly secret agent Black Widow in several installments of the Marvel Cinematic Universe. As the Major, Johansson delivers a very decent portrayal of an amnesiac cyborg starting to lose her touch with humanity. Okay, maybe her role here is cliched, from the mysterious past to the crime-fighting present history, but there is no doubt Johansson kicked butt as the movie's "Ghost in the Shell".

Michael Pitt is known for portraying rather chameleon-like characters, as in mysterious and peculiar behaving people who are just unpredictable. His role as Kuze, a seemingly villainous figure who carries a link to the Major's strange past, is again, much like most of the characters, cliched, but Pitt still pulls-off a good job.

Strangely, I cannot seem to find the words to properly judge the performances of the other cast mates. Personally, I blame the script for not really making a lot of the remaining characters unique from already established movie tropes. Despite this, though, the actors and actresses, at the minimum, put in some effort into their performances.

Asbæk, who portrays Batou, Mira's partner-in-crime-fighting, who is apparently a dog lover, has great non-romantic chemistry with Johansson's Mira. The legendary filmmaker "Beat" adds some energy to the movie as Major's superior in Section 9, and even having a standout moment for killing the movie's antagonist. Binoche and Ferdinando's performances are good as well.

Also, Rila Fukushima is here, as a hacked robot, who gets blown to bits in the opening sequence. Come on, guys.

Source
Direction and Quality = (5/5)

I am sensing a rather annoying trend in the modern movie-making industry, and that is spending all of the money on the best cinematographers, editors and visual effects experts in the business, and just make the story as the least priority. Yeah, there have been plenty of movies with a good story and spectacular CGI, but if you have not noticed it by now, there are a lot of blockbusters with the best special effects money can buy, but rather unpolished scripts. This movie follows that trend, sadly.

Again, the cinematography by Jess Hall, the CGI and the designs, costumes, especially the Major's "thermo-optical camouflage" suit, make-up and sets included, are very, very well done. The futuristic setting, complete with large, holographic advertisements, shines brightly, especially in the night. Although, if I were to be honest on what I really feel, I am getting a tad bit tired the same-old, same-old designs, since I have already seen the same type of structural concepts in other films set in a not-so distant future like Blade Runner, but overall, I can say that they did an impressive work with them. Besides, it is already hard to picture out other potential futures when the future is getting closer and closer.

I would like to give some praise to the people who designed the set for the "human network". I admire just how creepy and unnerving it is to behold. And the design? Wow, it is just phenomenal.


Source
It would really be a huge disappointment if a movie with this big budget had terrible fight sequences, and thankfully, with Rupert Sanders' steady hand, even though the movie lacks screenwriting creativity, we are offered to huge tons of visually stunning action scenes, which you may or may not consider as trying too hard to be in the same style as The Matrix's segments. However, do note that the magic of the fights might be undermined by the script's many problems, which is heartbreaking. The absolute best one is the opening part, wherein the Major fights hacked civilians in a geisha restaurant, while also using her camouflage suit to crash through the window as an entrance in slow-motion.

Like I said a few times before, I have a rusty memory, almost that of Logan's, so I decided to search the score done by Clint Mansell and Lorne Balfe, and while reviewing, it is unquestionably beautiful. When you close your eyes while listening to their musical pieces, it feels as if you are in a neo-noir cybernetically futuristic world, full of advancements. Sometimes, it make you feel as if you are in a different world. Trust me, I tried, and that is just how amazing the score sets the mood for the movie.


Source
Story, Dialogue and Flow = (2/5)

Caution: spoilers ahead! Avert your eyes, immediately!

As much as I admire the artistically exquisite cinematography, there is almost absolutely nothing that I love or enjoy about the story. Remember, I said "almost". I may review movies for a living (not really), but I would never dismiss something as entirely terrible without dissecting each part carefully.

Like I said earlier before, how the characters are written in this adaptation is far inferior than how they were portrayed in the manga and the anime works. Imagine if you combine that, by today's standards, worn-out elements established by other cult classic works of science-fiction such as the two movies we mentioned awhile back, and most especially and obviously RoboCop, and trade-out all of the philosophical themes and concepts heavily discussed in the source material, for one-dimensional and cliched characterization. It is because that all of the characters were uninteresting, and the story ultimately lackluster. We will discuss the cliches later, but let us continue further on with the story.

How Kuze's motivations are explained in the movie, which is revealed to his acts of revenge against his creators for being left for dead after being marked as a failed experiment, is predictable, and the revelation that ... spoiler alert ... Kuze and the Major, were actually Japanese (?), were close friends in childhood felt rushed.


source
And speaking of these two being Japanese, this feels like a confirmation to the claims that the movie resorted to whitewashing. Okay, okay, I understand that the studio is aiming for international audience appeal in the form of Scarlett Johansson, and I would let that slide, and I would also accept an in-movie explanation that the reason they changed her appearance to that of Scarlett Johansson's as a form of "corporate decision" or whatever, but no. I am okay with Johansson's casting though. There was no doubt she was great for the role. It would have been better had they retained the nationality, or better yet, had the movie set somewhere else rather than Japan, or make a different movie, because why even set the movie in Japan when there are not even that much Japanese actors and actresses. Maybe I'm overthinking this part. 


Source
But like I said, there are some good bits. For example, as evidenced through the dialogue, we get to explore a few tidbits of the Major's struggles of not being entirely human, given her condition of being part-machine. It is a clear sign that there was some thought put into the script. The idea that Hanka Robotics, Cutter's company, is kidnapping innocents for experiments, is horrifying, and would have made Cutter a much more despicable villain had the idea been further expanded upon. The concept's interconnected network of minds, like a inter-neural cyberspace, sounds fun, as well as that part wherein people can hack through machines with their minds, but like all these three, they were not explored thoroughly.


Source

Ending, Originality and Story Fulfillment = (2/5)

Like I said, none of the characters are entirely interesting, and the cliches are everywhere, such as the Major being your "average cop of tomorrow with memory loss", Batou being the "less-serious partner", Cutter being the "secretly evil businessman treating the good guy like property", and Oulete as the "shady creator". Add that up with borrowed elements from all of the sci-fi movies we mentioned back, and you have enough evidence to label the story as "derivative", or "unoriginal".

And as expected, lead heroine recalls the past, shady figure sharing a past with the protagonist join forces to stop the main bad guy, and the rest of her colleagues work hand-in-hand to stop the main bad guy Cutter. With Doctor Ouelet dead, after helping the Major escape, Cutter unleashes hell with a "spider-tank", which is basically the ED-209 from, you guessed it, RoboCop, with a spider theme. Kuze dies, offering to have their minds joined like the one done in the anime. The disappointing about this ending is that the leading lady does not even get to kill Cutter herself, but it was Aramaki who pulled the trigger. It is not entirely disappointing, but it would make sense and would make the Major's story reach a full circle.

Overall, the movie is just as predictable as you could have guessed, and the ending, while having a fun battle, felt empty. I just hope they could have tried a little bit more. I know they did, but maybe a little bit more.

Overall Evaluation = (2/5)

Technically brilliant but narrative-wise shallow, this movie is just another expensive and boring techno thriller that unfortunately does not do its insanely popular source material much justice, but it is okay at best.

TOTAL = 14/25 (Okay?)

Scarlett Johansson's amazing acting chops are wasted on this dull and forgettable rendition of Ghost in the Shell, an adaptation that has all the style but none of the substance that made the manga and the anime versions great.


Source

Hollywood is not gonna stop breaking fans hearts with many more, probably, adaptations, but we can always hope for a better possibility. But do remember not to hope too much, because I know how that felt while I was in Tenth Grade. Still, we have live-action versions of Akira and Death Note, with the latter to be shown through Netflix, a video-streaming giant known for some awesome programs, to wait-up for. Sigh. And with that, we end our review of Ghost in the Shell. And since we brought-up Death Note, here is the trailer, and if you are asking what I think about it, I would go with "I don't know". Stay tuned for more Dateline Movies!